AI commentary is built for the news cycle.
I think in three-year horizons.
For the people who actually have to decide.
One essay a week. Long enough to matter, short enough to read. Always sourced. Always disclosed.
New here? Read these first.
Three essays that each show a different strand of the argument the rest of the archive is building on.
- 01LONG ARC
The Permission Problem
After chips and power, permission is the third constraint. How AI infrastructure became a regulatory cost-allocation story.
10 min - 02LONG ARC
The Title Is Arriving. The Authority Isn't.
Every Fortune 100 board is about to hire one. The reporting line determines whether the role works — and it gets decided before the job description is even posted.
13 min - 03DECISION MAKER
The Call That Already Happened
The shareholder suit that turned AI oversight from a governance hobby into personal director liability.
6 min
Four pillars
Pick the question you're actually trying to answer.
Decisions playing out over 18–36 months, not news-cycle takes.
Tracing cascading effects, not just first-order outcomes.
Connecting lessons across banking, manufacturing, healthcare, EdTech, governance.
Written for board directors, PE operating partners, CTOs, GCs, and founders.
Recent essays
The Physical AI Era
AI has a body now, and the discipline to run it is not yet in place.
Access Is Not Property
The week Claude Fable and Mythos went dark showed that frontier AI has moved from product to permission. The architecture implications will take years to work through.
The Title Is Arriving. The Authority Isn't.
Most companies are about to hire a Head of AI Governance. The one detail that determines whether the role works is being decided right now, before the job description is even posted.
One essay a week. Decision-maker horizon. No noise.
Long enough to chew on Monday. Short enough that you actually read it. Read by board directors, operating partners, and founders working out what to do about AI.
